Editor Interview: Christy Ottaviano (Christy Ottaviano Books/​Macmillan)

This month’s Editor Interview is with publisher Christy Ottaviano, who runs a boutique imprint at Henry Holt and Company/​Macmillan that specializes in making children’s books that “encourage imagination and free-​thinking, foster a sense of family and community, target the feelings of children, and speak directly to young people’s interest as they explore various milestones.”

If that’s not reason enough to get her onboard for an Industry Insider interview @ OPB, then try these three facts.

  1. She’s edited a handful of New York Times bestsellers.
  2. She’s edited books that have won the National Book Award, the Ezra Jack Keats Award, the E.B. White Award, and the Coretta Scott King Award, among others.
  3. She has graduate degrees in English and American Literature (Boston College) and Education (Columbia University).

Clearly Macmillan knows what she brings to the table because Christy’s been working for them since 1992! In a publishing world where the only constant seems to be change and transition, that’s a fact that’s nearly impossible to believe. But read on, OPB fans, to find out for yourself what Christy’s secret to success might be.


RVC: Let’s start with a question I’ve never asked before. How did it feel the moment you realized you were going to have your own named imprint at a major publishing house? I’m going to guess that the primary emotion back in 2008 when Christy Ottaviano Books was formed might’ve been…WAHOOO!!!! Am I close?

CO: Haha. Yes, it was a great day. I remember making a conscious decision not to call my partner Kevin with the good news as I wanted to share it in person. I have a long commute, and that night when Kevin picked me up from the train station, I opened the car door, saw my three kids smiling from the backseat (they were very young at the time), and happily jumped in and shared the news. My kids, of course, had no idea what any of it meant but it was a special moment to share with my family.

RVC: When Publisher’s Weekly announced the new imprint, they said it’s going to be 50% picture books, 45% MG and YA, and 5% nonfiction. What’s the ratio look like today? Is there a percentage commitment to certain areas, or is it all about what comes across the transom?

CO: Over the years, I have shifted a bit in some genres. I would say my list is about 45% picture books, 45% middle grade, and 10% YA. I definitely publish more nonfiction these days in both the picture book and middle grade genres–probably by at least 25%. I love nonfiction so this has been a natural step especially now with the market embracing nonfiction much more due to the educational emphasis on STEM.

RVC: Let’s back up a moment to the start of your career. From your college degrees (English/​American lit, a French minor, and Education credentials), it seems like you had a different career path in mind. What happened? When did the kidlit bug get you?

CO: I think my career path organically led me to where I am. I always loved reading and writing, and graduated college with an English degree. I went on to pursue a graduate degree in literature with the plan to become a college professor. After getting my master’s in English and American Literature, I taught high school for a year and realized how much I loved teaching creative writing. Around that time I was taking some children’s literature classes at Simmons College and heard an editor speak about her career. Her job’s requirements as an editor seemed like a perfect match for my skills and interests, so I enrolled in a publishing program at Radcliffe College and got my first job in publishing working as an editorial assistant at Henry Holt. But I wasn’t entirely sure it would work out given the competition in the field, so for many years, I took classes after work and obtained a second master’s degree from Teachers College with a plan B to return to education, just in case.

Ironically, this plan proved incredibly formative as I took classes in writing, children’s literature, art history, and painting. All the years I spent in graduate school evaluating text and art definitely helped me grow as an editor. And I credit Macmillan for supporting me in my ascent from editorial assistant to Publisher of my own imprint.

RVC: Why picture books? What about them appeals to you so much?

CO: From an early age, first impressions about story and art are formed by way of this inspiring genre. Picture books are the gateway to reading for young children. It’s a powerful art form and one I feel transcends age as picture book readers tend to be readers for life. It’s a format that I feel can perfectly encapsulate a feeling, a moment, a subject, a place and time.

As cliché as it may sound, picture books have a true magic about them.

RVC: If someone were going to read three of your titles to get a good handle on your picture book sensibility, what three would you recommend?

CO: Arnie the Doughnut by Laurie Keller, Same, Same But Different by Jenny Sue Kostecki-​Shaw, and Counting on Katherine: How Katherine Johnson Saved Apollo 13 by Helaine Becker, illustrated by Dow Phumiruk.

RVC: One of the things I see in your imprint’s lineup is a strong sense of diversity of character, theme, and style–and that’s not even taking account Arnie and his awesome donut-ness. 

How do you handle when someone’s writing outside of their own direct experiences? 

CO: That’s a difficult question to answer because the circumstances differ for each author and with each book. Using sensitivity readers and outside experts has been an important part of my process from the beginning of my career. But also vitally important–I’ve worked hard over the years to develop an aesthetic sense of what makes effective writing and what makes effective art. I use that sense to help me determine if I want to publish a book and how to work with an author in the revision process. As an editor, I bring both an intense closeness to the text as well as a bit of distance, which is crucial. The idea is to enable the author or artist’s work to shine in its best light.

RVC: Something people don’t typically appreciate about the role of an editor is how much research they have to do. How much digging-​around time do you put into a new author or manuscript?

CO: Ah, this is the fun part. As mentioned, I publish a good deal of nonfiction, and whenever I’m considering a subject–either pitching it to an author or responding to a submission–I love fully immersing myself in the material to learn as much as I can before I bring the project to the acquisition board. I’m an information junkie and I’m eager to soak up as much as I can on a particular subject. I may not always be up on the newest Netflix shows, but I think I make up for that by reading widely across sources–newspapers, magazines, newsletters, and, of course books. I’m always reading books. Usually two at a time.

RVC: In all of your experience in kidlit publishing, what has surprised you the most?

CO: The talent of writers and artists. I never get tired of reading wonderful words and looking at beautiful images. The talent keeps us all fresh and young and on our toes.

RVC: What’s a current picture book project that’s got you super jazzed?

CO: Ethan Long’s Hello, Worldthe first book in the Happy County series. This is a modern day Richard Scarry-inspired world full of early childhood content that speaks directly to preschoolers. Ethan is a hugely talented storyteller and artist who is also naturally funny. He taps into a child’s mind as he explores many milestone concepts for this age range.

On a personal note, Richard Scarry was my co-​pilot when my children were young–his books were able to appeal to all three of my kids when they were between the ages of 1 and 6. Whenever we traveled on vacation I would bring a Busy Book as it would keep all three kids content. Ethan Long’s Hello, World is off to a great start with starred reviews, and we have three more in the pipeline with a plan to publish two a year.

RVC: Richard Scarry was a big hit in my family’s reading repertoire, too. If Ethan’s on that same track, sign me up as a fan.

Okay, this next bit comes with a warning. What’s coming next might just be the most important thing you’ve been asked all week. With that in mind…what’s the update on your beloved 1950s red pool chair from the Flatiron Building? Is retirement on your porch all it dreamed it’d be?

CO: I’m sorry to say it’s still sitting in my sister’s NYC apartment. I brought it there by way of a cab (tight fit!) back in May and I still haven’t gotten myself over to pick it up and drive it back to Connecticut where I live. There is a spot waiting for it on our porch so I need to get on that.

Thanks for the reminder, Ryan!

RVC: Let’s shift gears and jump into the final part of the interview—THE SPEED ROUND! Pithy questions and zip-​zappy answers, please. Are you ready?

CO: Bring it on.

RVC: Worst day ever—no social media, no TV, or no books?

CO: Being far away from my family. But, if I’m limited to the choices above—it would be no reading material. When my boys were younger and adored LEGO, they used to say that if I was a mini fig, my accessories would be a cup of tea in one hand and a manuscript or a book in the other. I think that’s pretty accurate.

RVC: If your literary mascot was from the world of picture books, which would it be?

CO: Harry the Dirty Dog.

RVC: Weirdest job you ever had?

CO: I’m a collector and love affordable antiques and flea market finds. In grad school, I got a job working at the Cambridge Antique Market and loved getting to know all of the dealers. It was intriguing to see the different pieces that came in– such a selection of offbeat finds–everything from Bakelite jewelry from the 1930s to old board games of the 1970s like Clue and Operation, to vintage books, which I love and collect. It was a weird job in the best of ways as I never knew what a day at the market would bring in terms of what pieces would come in–a bit like “Antiques Roadshow.” We would have a lot of fun researching the find, and this was before Google so we had to do lots of digging. I loved it all.

RVC: Coolest picture book from the past year (not published by Macmillan)?

CO: Selina Alko’s picture book on Joni Mitchell. I love picture book biographies and publish widely in this genre. I also love music (who doesn’t?!) and Joni is someone whom I have read a lot about; she’s a fascinating subject. Selina spoke with me a bit about this project as she was working on it as we also publish books together. I’m eager to get my hands on a copy. The jacket is stunning.

RVC: If you could change one thing about the world of picture books, what would it be?

CO: I’d like to get picture books into the hands of more readers especially those with limited access.

RVC: Sum up your picture book philosophy in five words or fewer. 

CO: Books that make children grow, think imaginatively, and outside the box. Sorry, Ryan–that was double your word count!

RVC: That’s okay–it was worth it. Thanks so much, Christy!

Editor Interview: Andrea Spooner (Little, Brown Books for Young Readers)

It’s with great pleasure that I introduce Andrea Spooner, this month’s Industry Interview subject. Andrea’s the Vice President and Editorial Director of Picture Books at Little, Brown Books for Young Readers (LBYR). When I realized her imprint won a Caldecott Medal three years in a row, I knew I needed to find out a bit more about what kind of picture book magic they were cooking up there.

Here’s a bit about her. After joining LBYR in 2003, she’s worked with an amazing list of authors, including:

She’s also edited dozens of James Patterson’s books. What impresses me most of all, though, is how the people she works with rave about her. Consider this endorsement, from writer Crescent Dragonwagon: “Andrea took a lot of time finding just the right artist, and she is taking a lot of time working with him, and me. In 40 years of working with different publishers, I can remember no other children’s book editor who has ever involved me quite so much in the selection of the artists, and has engaged me so thoughtfully in discussing the pictures and my reactions to them.” And she adds that Andrea is “one of the most attentive and respectful editors I have ever had.”

Wow.

With that, let’s get on to the interview!


RVC: For some, working in the kidlit business seemed destined in the stars from the start. For others, it’s a curious accumulation of events that brought them to that future. Which was it for you? 

AS: Destined from the start! My mother was an artist and art historian, and my father was an English professor with a focus on writing short stories. I read voraciously and wrote prolifically as a child. The first long-​form story I wrote and illustrated, at age six, was called The Girl Who Hated School, followed up by an “illustrated novel” called Nancy and the U.F.O.! So, I always wanted to make books. I loved the interaction of picture and word… and nothing ever moved me like the books I read as a kid. I even wrote my college application essays about the Nancy Drew series as well as my favorite book of all time, Freaky Friday by Mary Rodgers. I guess it was a clear sign I took kidlit seriously from the beginning.

RVC: My kids wore out the DVD version of Freaky Friday with Jamie Lee Curtis, Mark Harmon, and Lindsay Lohan. But prior to that, I recall liking that book a great deal myself!

What were some of the key elements/​choices of your life that prepared you to be an editor?

AS: The most significant choice leading me toward my career might have been the day in seventh grade when I decided to join Yearbook Club, even though I was told it was only for eighth graders. Turns out just showing up with genuine commitment was more important than my age, and before the year was out I was editor-in-chief.

RVC: As former Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli famously said, “History is made by those who show up.”

AS: Editing the yearbook took over my life all the way through college. And perhaps choosing to go to Smith College, known for breeding kidlit folk, prepared me for this editing life! At Smith, I was a studio art major and writing minor, and there’s nothing quite like all those group critique sessions to prepare you for the task of gently sharing feedback.

RVC: Let’s talk recent picture book projects. What’s on the docket for 2020 that has you excited?

AS: Oh dear, it’s like you’re asking a mother to talk about her favorite child—it’s inherent betrayal not to speak of all of my books! I’m asking the universe to forgive me in advance for not mentioning the entire LBYR picture book list. But I don’t think anyone would begrudge me for sharing my intense excitement for Jerry Pinkney’s next brilliantly-​illustrated retelling! It’s The Little Mermaidand it’s the first major picture book version that reinvents the story as a friendship story instead of a romance, and that features a cast of mermaids with brown skin. It also leaves readers with the critical message that you should never give up your voice for anything. I think it has potential to become the most definitive contemporary reimagining of the story.

RVC: With books like that coming out from LBYR, I get a real sense why you’ve got that incredibly impressive 3‑peat of Caldecotts going. But I’ll ask anyway–to what do you attribute that streak of success?

AS: Do you mean when LBYR won a Medal three years in a row in 2015–2017? Or… do you mean last year in 2019 when we took three out of the five stickers?

Okay, okay, I don’t mean to sound smug, but yeah, we’re kind of proud of the track record. What I’m most proud of is that these stickers are on books with many different artists and editors and art directors. There’s not just one superstar on the list. It’s really about strong teamwork, I think. There are a lot of eyes on the project, from acquisition through creative development, and everyone on the team is very invested from day one. We also have a fantastic school & library division making sure the books get in front of all the right people at the right time.

RVC: Speaking of 3s, you personally edited three Caldecott winners as well. Coincidence?

AS: I’m exceptionally lucky! It helps when you’re working with bona-​fide geniuses like Jerry Pinkney, Patrick McDonnell, and Oge Mora, who all have pretty powerful and sophisticated creative muses. And I wouldn’t be working with them if it weren’t for the intercession of my former mentor David Reuther, former LBYR editor Amy Lin, and art director Sasha Illingworth, so I can’t take credit for actually discovering this incredible talent.

If I ever make a difference in elevating work to a sticker-​worthy level, it’s likely derived from my willingness to question a choice that’s being made and to push the author or artist to justify it, even the seasoned people. But I’m also willing to step back and let the artist’s muse be the voice in charge. The trick is figuring out when the time is right for each!

RVC: I was pleasantly surprised to find that you edited one of my fav picture books of 2018, Thank You, Omu! How did that project come into being?

AS: It’s such a happy story! One of our art directors, Sasha Illingworth, was providing critiques at the Rhode Island School of Design in a picture book-​making class, and she came back recommending that editors take a look at several of the students’ final projects, which really impressed her. Oge’s project, Omu’s Stew, was at the top. It was clear from the start that Oge had a remarkable handle on the totality of what makes a great picture book, and that it came naturally to her. We offered her a two-​book deal while she was still a senior in college.

RVC: That’s an inspiring story for sure! What’s it like working with such an early-​career talent? What kind of different considerations do you have with them versus, say, working with a mid-​career or senior-​level creative?

AS: I think the way I work is mostly unrelated to how long the creator has been in the business. Of course, with debut talent I try to make sure that I take more time to explain the stages of the publishing process, and the vocabulary and quirks of it. Ultimately, though, each creator has individual needs that aren’t related to where in their career they are. I first try to get a sense of what their goals for the project are, figure out what makes their creative heart ticks, and learn what kind of managing or mentorship they need to generate their best work. Sometimes that involves trial and error, for sure. For me, with a new author it can take longer to figure out the key to a smooth creative process. After I’ve worked with someone once or twice, it’s easier to keep the author or artist happily engaged, productive, and open to feedback.

RVC: You’ve talked about how one of the many tasks of an editor is to improve the read-​aloud experience. What are some specific ways that can happen?

AS: We start by reading that manuscript aloud. Authors can do this too as they write and self-​edit. If you find yourself tripping on certain word/​sound combinations or sentences, rewrite it or cut it. Better yet, have a few others read the manuscript aloud and flag any patterns of stumbling. Reading the text aloud also gives you a sense of where the pacing feels too slow. Sometimes I find myself looking forward to the end of a sentence, paragraph, or page. That might be the sign of an area that can be tightened. I want to feel like I’m relishing each word.

RVC: With my fav picture books, that’s exactly it. “Relishing each word.”

AS: And, of course, we think about the page turns—they’re an essential part of the read-​aloud experience. Those dramatic pauses should be intentionally placed. They propel you through the narrative, and can leave you with an underlying question about what’s going to happen next. I always start editing by paginating a text, since helps me focus on the read-​aloud experience.

RVC: At LBYR acquisitions meetings, are picture book manuscripts actually read aloud? Does everyone have a copy in front of them, too?

AS: Reading the book aloud would be part of my fantasy vision of an acquisitions meeting—I’d love to know if any houses actually do that! But, it’s essential that everyone reads and thinks about acquisitions materials ahead of time; there would rarely be time to perform the books live in such meeting. At LBYR, editorial directors for each genre under consideration are expected to have vetted the manuscript for its viability prior to putting it on the agenda. And sometimes, read-​aloud quality emerges later in the editing and polishing process. So, the manuscript might not even have a perfect “mouthfeel” at acquisitions stage, but it has enough other exciting qualities to motivate us to make an offer.

RVC: So much of the submission process is a matchmaking game that can feel like blind luck, at times. Let’s help some people out here. What are a few likes/​dislikes of yours in terms of themes, subjects, and/​or styles?

AS: As an editorial director, I’ve trained myself to look beyond my own personal likes and dislikes when considering if a project is right for the LBYR list. We need a diverse portfolio in all respects in order to survive and thrive. As an example, I used to say “don’t send me lovey-​dovey books”, but nowadays, I’m totally open to them. I’m better able to look beyond the genre and think “are there audiences out there that like this and want this? Is the market for this kind of thing underserved, or do we have a gap on our list for it?” Some people might say it’s freeing to get to the point in your career when you’re at liberty to only work on the books you personally adore. For me it’s been the opposite–it’s actually been really freeing to embrace things I wouldn’t have necessarily purchased for my own collection.

Is that a cop-​out answer?

RVC: Well…

AS: Okay, okay, I’ll give you this much: For personal projects, right now I’m dreaming of silly-​but-​smart stories that scratch the itch we all have to laugh more in our increasingly troubled world. I tend to be drawn to absurdist humor. Science and nature/​environmental themes often resonate with me. I’m also keen on books that address important moments of child development, and I’m currently seeking more stories that feature differently-​abled characters from authentic perspectives. I’m also always looking for substantive stories with strong voice, re-​readability, and emotional resonance. For art, I look for work with a “signature style.” Once a style becomes trendy and ubiquitous, I’m less stimulated by it.

RVC: Beyond any issue of theme, subject, or style, what are your submission pet peeves?

AS: Manuscripts accompanied by an eternally long pitches and story summaries that are longer than the story itself. Give me one really strong paragraph about the market viability and comparative titles, and if there’s an interesting backstory to the story or connection to the author’s life, that can be another tight paragraph. Also, if we want to get petty for a moment, I’m put off by manuscripts that are single-spaced!

RVC: I’m so glad you said that. I’ve been telling students for years to keep on double-​spacing their submissions, and I’m not sure they believe me. Now I have proof!

AS: By the way, including art notes in a picture book text is absolutely not a pet peeve of mine. So many picture book writers have been told not to do this. But to me, I like to know that a writer has a sense of how visual storytelling impacts a narrative and how they intrinsically work together. A writer shouldn’t be wedded to their proposed vision, but they could convey it at pre-​acquisition for the sake of transparency, and sense. You have to remember that the non-​editorial folks like sales and marketing who are a part of the acquisition conversation may not have the same visual literacy or imagination as an author—and even the best editors aren’t capable of reading an author’s mind! But I am perfectly capable of removing art notes from a manuscript after acquisition if I think they’ll impede an artist’s own personal vision.

RVC: Lots of kidlit industry folks spend a lot of time on social media and their web presence. You seem less concerned about that. Is that a choice or the effects of being so busy with work that it’s on the perpetual back burner?

AS: Thanks for shooting that arrow right into my Achilles heel, Ryan!

RVC: Is it really an Achilles heel?

AS: Sometimes I think it is, but I have complicated feelings about it. I unequivocally admire with awe and wonder those many editors who consistently produce high-​quality books, manage robust lists, and maintain a vibrant social media presence. I’ll never be one of them, and it’s probably a personal failing of mine, but I have to embrace what I’m best at and make the most of it. We have a fantastic marketing department to publicize the authors and books. My “brand,” if I must have one in this day and age, is about what I do behind the curtains rather than what I’m saying on the public stage.

RVC: Let’s talk about that behind-​the-​curtains stuff.

AS: Here’s the thing: I spend or eleven or twelve hours a day largely in front of a screen. I don’t want to spend one minute more. This time and energy, for me, is best spent working for my authors, managing projects as seamlessly as possible, shaping the list and mentoring staff. I consider myself not just an editor, but a customer service representative—and I say that in all seriousness! My number one goal is for everyone, externally and internally, to feel like the process went off as smoothly as possible, and that we made a book we couldn’t have done better… without the benefit of hindsight, anyway.

I haven’t yet found a way to do all that and spend time sorting through the daily mess of social media and maintain my own polished social presence in a way that would meet my own standards. Frankly, I’m really not good at expressing any worthwhile thought in 140 characters or less, as you can see from this interview! There’s too much unnecessary chatter out there as it is. I see myself doing the world a service by not adding to it.

RVC: I typically keep my questions focused on picture books, but my kids LOVED the Patterson Middle School series, so I have to ask something about him. He’s so prolific that I’m inclined to ask how many James Pattersons there are! But I’ll assume there’s just one (unless you secretly tell me otherwise). 

Here’s an actual question about him, though–in all your experience in working with him, what has surprised you the most?

AS: That he is the real deal in every respect. He’s just one person, yes, who’s deeply connected to every book with his name on it—he’s not rubber-​stamping anything. There’s no team of people inventing the core stories; he drafts every single outline, and even the kids’ book outlines we worked on together were about 50 pages long, so there’s a lot of detail. He’s always at his desk working. Over the course of a dozen years of working together I could probably count on one hand times I called him that he didn’t pick up the phone. He’s genuinely passionate about writing, and promoting the pleasure and excitement of reading, which is what motivated his move into kids’ books. There’s nothing he’d rather being doing than writing. Except occasionally playing golf or watching a movie. I also learned a lot from Jim about the craft of commercial writing, especially when it comes to the emotional experience of reading. But those are trade secrets I can’t give away!

RVC: Alright, it’s time for the final part of the interview. The always-​surprising, often-​quippy, ever-​zippy LIGHTNING ROUND. Are you ready?

AS: Of course not! Have you not yet noticed that quips are not my specialty? Remember what I said about being able to say anything in 140 characters or less?

RVC: Don’t overthink it.

AS: That’s what my bosses always say on my performance reviews. Okay, let’s try it!

RVC: Star Trek, Star Wars, or Stargate?

AS: Star Trek! I mean… Leonard Nimoy, George Takei, Nichelle Nichols… and quantum teleportation!

RVC: Secret hobby you have that no one would suspect?

AS: Will anyone know what pysanka is?

RVC: Probably not. Let’s save them from having to Google it, though.

AS: It’s the art of making Ukranian Easter eggs with old-​world tools like a wooden/​metal stylus, beeswax, an open flame, and dyes. Mine are not anywhere near as good as what you see on Wikipedia.

RVC: What four picture book characters do you invite over for Sunday afternoon smoothies at the Spooner house? What’s your dream lineup?

AS: Well, if it’s Sunday afternoon in our little apartment, they’d have to be very well-​behaved! So I think Rosie Revere, Ada Twist, Sofia Valdez, and Iggy Peck would fit make for some very scintillating conversation. My other favorites are way too naughty.

RVC: Hardest venue to get a starred review?

AS: I can’t remember the last time I got a star from The Bulletin of the Center for Children’s Books. I don’t lose sleep over it.

RVC: Coolest non-​LBYR picture book of 2019?

AS: Hmmm, when it comes to “cool” I think the Melissas have it, for me—I’m debating between The Balcony by Melissa Castrillon and How to Read a Book by Kwame Alexander and Melissa Sweet. The art for both books just vibrates with energy, passion, and endless detail.

RVC: Three words that sum up your picture book philosophy.

AS: Aw, that’s just cruel. I am not a woman of brevity…

RVC: Give it a shot!

AS: Read. It. Again.

RVC: Thanks so much, Andrea! 

And for you artistic OPB fans out there, here’s a LBYR public service announcement. They’re starting their fourth year of the Emerging Artist Award. Their first winner just had their book published and it won a New York Times Best Illustrated Book of 2019 honor, so the future seems bright for these winners. Consider applying–perhaps you’ll soon be working with Andrea or one of her amazingly cool colleagues!

Editor Interview: Carol Hinz (Millbrook Press & Lerner Publishing)

OPB readers, friends, and fans, what better way to wrap up 2019 than getting to know Carol Hinz, Editorial Director of Millbrook Press and Carolrhoda Books at Lerner Publishing Group? Her Twitter bio gives a lot of extra insight into who she is and what she’s about: “Also knitter, baker, ballerina, and wrangler of two small humans.” Talk about some pithy bio data, right?

Since OPB is all about underpromising and overdelivering, here are three more Carol Facts to enjoy.

  1. First book publishing job was an internship at Graywolf Press.
  2. Favorite color? Blue (in all shades and hues).
  3. Most unusual airplane carry-​on item? She brought her figure skates to the NCTE conference in Baltimore at the end of November so she could skate at the rink that’s along the harbor. Carol says, “It was totally worth the effort—and all the funny looks I got when people at the conference found out I’d done it!”

With that, let’s get to the Qs and As!


RVC: You ran into a pre-​career crossroads in high school—science and English. We know which choice you made (obviously!), but what appealed to you so much about science?

CH: I’ve always been a curious person, and I think my science classes and my English classes fed my curiosity in different ways. With science, I loved finding out more about the ways the world—and the universe—works, and at least at the high school level, I liked that the questions I was grappling with had definitive answers. There’s something comforting about being able to follow a procedure or a certain line of thinking and come up with a consistent result.

RVC: An example of that scientific curiosity appears in the range of books you’ve edited, like The Vast Wonder of the World: Biologist Ernest Everett Just and If You Were the Moon, or Dazzle Ships: World War I and the Art of Confusion and One Plastic Bag: Isatou Ceesay and the Recycling Women of the Gambia. What’s an unexpected topic or two you’d love to deal with via a book at some point?

CH: I like to be surprised by books—whether that surprise comes from encountering a topic I was previously unfamiliar with or from encountering an innovative presentation of a familiar topic. And I think many reviewers, educators, parents, and kids (especially kids!) enjoy being surprised as well.

I’m not someone who has a running list of super specific topics I’m looking for, but here are some things that have been on my mind lately:

  • Books that incorporate antiracist concepts and work toward dismantling white supremacy in ways that are engaging and meaningful for children (and adults).
  • Books that present science topics other than biology. Kids in the typical picture book age range often love animals, but I’d love to see some innovative, kid-​friendly approaches to other areas, including technology, mathematics, and engineering.
  • This last one isn’t a specific topic, but I’m looking for BIPOC authors and authors from other marginalized backgrounds to write about all manner of topics. Particularly in nonfiction, the vast majority of authors are white, and I would love to see a greater diversity of voices and perspectives represented.

RVC: I share that BIPOC wish, as well, and I’m doing what I can here with my cadre of students at Ringling College of Art and Design’s Creative Writing program. (Watch for their manuscripts in about three years!)

But let’s talk directly about where you work. One of the things I like about Lerner is that they take the time to carefully brand their products via imprints. I think of Millbrook as being curriculum + engagement. With Carolrhoda, it’s more imagination + inspiration. 

CH: Yes, that’s a great way of putting it! I typically say that for Millbrook, I’m looking for books that present curricular concepts in playful or unusual ways. And in Carolrhoda, I’m looking for quirky humor and books that give children an opportunity to see the world (or themselves) in new ways.

RVC: One of the things I admire about your work as an editor is how you’re not afraid of going right after tough topics, as readers encounter in Can I Touch Your Hair? Poems of Race, Mistakes, and Friendship, and Sachiko: A Nagasaki Bomb Survivor’s Story, to name just two examples. How do you negotiate the balance between what readers NEED and what readers WANT? And while we’re at it, let’s add in the challenge of what parents, teachers, and librarians think, too, right?

CH: Thank you, Ryan. With the books you mention, a couple of key things were not rushing the editorial process and incorporating the feedback of other people—both colleagues at Lerner and expert readers. I don’t think any one person is going to have perfect instincts for how to handle a challenging topic on the first draft or on the first read through a manuscript. But having time to sit with it, to read other, relevant writing on the topic, and to get feedback from fellow editors or consultants is enormously helpful.

Beyond that, we also need to be humble—the authors and I are going to do our best, but all books, especially those that grapple with topics not traditionally covered in children’s books, will still be criticized. Not every reader is going to be looking for the same thing from a book on a given topic, and we have to be okay with that, whether or not we agree with the criticism.

RVC: While Can I Touch Your Hair? has received a lot of critical praise, some readers are uncomfortable with parts of it—most specifically the poem called “The N‑Bomb.” That’s a prime example of what we’re talking about here, isn’t it?

CH: Definitely. I think adults (particularly white adults) don’t give kids enough credit for what they can handle. This often comes out of a desire to protect kids from all the terrible things that are a part of our world. But we need to keep in mind that not all kids receive that protection, and we can’t control when a kid is going to first encounter something biased, racist, or hateful. To those adults who feel uncomfortable, I say: Isn’t it far better for a kid to encounter the N‑word (or some other “difficult” subject matter) for the first time in the pages of the book, when there’s time and space for a kid to think about it and talk with a trusted adult about it, rather than encountering it first in some other way when there might not be opportunity for thought and conversation?

For more, check out a blog post that Irene Latham, Charles Waters, and I wrote about this very topic.

RVC: Thanks for extending our conversation with the link to that informative post. Much appreciated!

Let’s move back into your work as an editor in general by asking a question few editors get asked. How do you measure success?

CH: Ultimately, success is a book reaching a young reader who appreciates it. And I want our books to get into the hands as many of those young readers as possible, which means connecting with the people who put books into kids’ hands—booksellers, educators, librarians, and parents.

RVC: How do you achieve such a thing?

CH: There are different routes to achieving this goal. It could be getting multiple starred reviews, winning one or more awards, getting on state reading lists, having an author who does a lot of school visits and events, or some other combination of things. Success isn’t always the moments we see on social media—and a whole lot of work and revision and doubt and hope go into every single book we make, with the goal of each book finding its own path to readers.

RVC: Since you brought up the idea of writers/​books finding a path to readers … a lot of writers come to OPB to gain insight into how to improve their chances of selling a picture book manuscript, and sometimes that means investigating the submission process itself as much as talking about issues of craft. So, let’s help them out. Plenty of editors encounter phrases and words in cover letters and queries that are an absolute turn off. Got any to warn writers away from using with you?

CH: Ultimately, I’m a lot more interested in the manuscript than I am in the cover letter or query. That said, I’m turned off by bashing an entire category or genre because an author thinks their work is better than all of it, comments that the author’s child/​neighbor/​grandchild loves the story (because I need people who don’t already know and love the author to also love the story), and an obvious lack of knowledge about a certain genre or category (e.g. a 3,000-word picture book).

RVC: Let’s go with one more writer-​friendly question. How has nonfiction changed over the years of your editing career, and what trends/​shifts might we expect in 2020 and beyond?

CH: Oooh, interesting question. There’s definitely more interest in STEM and STEAM topics and less interest in historical topics (unless the book is about a historical “hidden figure” of some sort). Animal life cycle books used to be a nonfiction staple, but I almost never see them anymore unless they have an innovative approach (such as My Awesome Summer by P. Mantis by Paul Meisel.)

The last few years I’ve been thinking a lot about the different categories of nonfiction, as described by Melissa Stewart. For picture books, I’m seeing lots of narrative nonfiction, some really great expository literature, and a small amount of traditional nonfiction. (For more about nonfiction categories, check out Melissa’s blog and read her School Library Journal article on the topic.)

I’m also seeing a lot of interesting approaches to blending nonfiction and fiction. For instance, Flower Talk: How Flowers Use Color to Communicate by Sara Levine, illustrated by Masha D’yans is narrated by a cantankerous cactus, but the information conveyed is all true. I realize books like this can pose a challenge for librarians—where to shelve them?—but I also expect to be seeing more in this vein.

Word counts remain higher than for fiction. With narrative nonfiction, I generally go for 1,000 or fewer words in the main text, though Dazzle Ship: World War I and the Art of Confusion by Chris Barton is about 1,400 words and Let ’Er Buck!: George Fletcher, the People’s Champion by Vaunda Micheaux Nelson is 1,500 words. Expository literature typically has a lower word count, though a book with multiple levels of text (such as those in Jess Keating’s World of Weird Animals series) may go higher.

Including back matter and providing sources has become increasingly essential, and I’m enjoying just what a wide range of elements authors are including in back matter. Different topics will necessarily be served by different back matter.

Incremental but important progress has been made in publishing picture books by and about BIPOC and people from other marginalized backgrounds (and those books being recognized with starred reviewed and awards), and it’s my belief that this is not a trend but rather part of a permanent, ongoing shift.

Overall, I believe it’s a great time to be making nonfiction. There’s so much room for creativity and experimentation in terms of both format and topic, and I am inspired by all the great nonfiction I’m seeing out there!

RVC: A few years back, you (delightfully) interviewed your own kids on the Lerner Books blog. I’d like to wrap up the first part of this interview with variations on three of the questions you asked them. Here we go. 

#1—What do you like best about being a mom who is a children’s book editor? 

CH: I love that what I do in my job has such a meaningful connection with being a parent: my experiences with my kids inform my work and my experiences with making books inform the way I raise my children. I also think that the act of reading picture books aloud is incredibly powerful, and doing so night after night after night can’t help but shape my understanding of how to make a great picture book.

RVC: #2—What’s your favorite picture book to have worked on?

CH: All of them! That’s a valid answer, right? Truly, I love the books we publish and feel so lucky to be able to work with such incredible authors and illustrators.

If I had to pick a picture book that has had particular meaning for both me and my kids this year, I would choose A Map into the World by Kao Kalia Yang, illustrated by Seo Kim. My 6‑year-​old son loves it [OPB Note: Carol was kind enough to provide a snapshot of her and the aforementioned son enjoying that very book!], and we’ve been reading it multiple times a week for months now. Although it’s a book I completely adore, I was surprised to see it have such staying power for him. This blog post shares more of the story behind the book and how it has led to some very meaningful connections for both of my kids.

RVC: #3—How many picture books have you read them in their lives?

CH: Oh, probably a couple thousand.

RVC: That’s a good answer, Carol, but it’s wrong. According to child #2, it’s 5,952. But you were close!

And now, we move on to the SPEED ROUND where the point values are doubled, and the answers will zing as fast as the answers zoom. READY?

CH: You betcha!

RVC: Best place in Minneapolis to get hot dish?

CH: Probably in a church basement or at someone’s home! Instead, I’d like to recommend the fantastic fry bread tacos at the Four Sisters Farmers Market. I went there on a day last fall when illustrator Marlena Myles was signing copies of Thanku: Poems of Gratitude with the Hennepin County library system, and there I discovered that books and fry bread tacos are a great combination! (Though you do need to be careful not to spill on your book…)

RVC: Favorite late-​night reading beverage?

CH: Water.

RVC: Who’d you most like to edit a picture book from? LeBron James, Kim Kardashian, or Ariana Grande? 

CH: Hahaha! Whichever one of them has spent the last 5+ years reading recently published picture books, drafting multiple manuscripts, and working with a critique group as they honed their writing skills—and would respect my editorial input. 😉

RVC: A Lerner picture book that’s totally awesome yet somehow underappreciated?

CH: Love, Agnes: Postcards from an Octopus by Irene Latham, illustrated by Thea Baker. It’s an innovative look at the giant Pacific Octopus life cycle as portrayed via a series of postcards exchanged by Agnes, various other sea creatures, and a boy on land. It’s clever and charming, whether you’re primarily interested in the storyline or in the octopus facts!

RVC: The coolest picture book of 2019 that wasn’t edited by someone named Carol is …

CH: Gah, this is so hard! I’m going to cheat and break this into a few categories.

For fiction, I’d have to say Home in the Woods by Eliza Wheeler. Every aspect is so well done, and the text, the illustrations, and the design work wonderfully together to create a cohesive whole. Both of my kids also love it!

For nonfiction, I’m going to go with The Undefeated by Kwame Alexander, illustrated by Kadir Nelson. When I first saw the book, I thought it was gorgeous but perhaps too sophisticated for a young audience. But when I brought it home and read it to my younger son, he was very engaged. While he and I had previously talked about race in different ways, we’d not talked much about systemic racism and the long history of racial injustice in the United States, and this book opened the door to some really powerful conversations.

For a science-​themed picture book, I’d say Moth: An Evolution Story by Isabel Thomas, illustrated by Daniel Egnéus. I’d been hearing good things about it and finally got it from the library. My 6‑year-​old son  and I both learned a lot! It is such a clear presentation of a complex idea, and the illustrations are fantastic as well.

RVC: Sum up your picture book philosophy in three words.

CH: Make me care.

(By which I mean that you the author start off invested in the story you’re telling or the topic you’re writing about. But your readers may not be invested in the same way, so you need to find a way to make me–and all readers–care about it.)

RVC: Thanks so much, Carol! This was a sincere pleasure.

 

Editor Interview: Emma Ledbetter (Abrams Books for Young Readers)

This month’s Industry Insider interview is with Emma Ledbetter, Editorial Director of Picture Books at Abrams Books for Young Readers. Why am I so stoked about this that I’m including a gif of a dancing Muppet here? It’s because she wowed the crowd at an SCBWI event in Orlando this past June, and yours truly was in the audience. And I mean wowed as in WOWed.

I could say more, but let’s instead hear what her new colleague, Andrew Smith (senior VP and publisher of the kidlit division at Abrams), wrote about her in a November 2018 article for Publisher’s Weekly. “Emma’s editorial career includes an expansive and impressive array of engaging picture books that have earned countless stellar reviews and accolades, but most important, they’ve delighted and enlightened young readers. I’m thrilled that she will be bringing her keen eye and expert taste to Abrams, and I’m very excited about the contributions she’ll be making to our list.”

Gosh, that’s so nice that I’m blushing!

Need more, though? I’ll give you five additional Emma bio/​career nuggets, then it’s interview time.

  1. She has a BA in Art History from Yale University.
  2. She had internships at Little, Brown, Nickelodeon, and Nick Jr.
  3. Her Twitter handle is indeed a shout-​out to fans of Frances (the most famous badger in all of kidlit).
  4. She loves Edward Gorey.
  5. She edited the picture book Ida, Always by Caron Levis (illustrated by Charles Santoso).

Ready for the interview now? Onward!


RVC: How did someone studying Art History at Yale end up with internships at Nickelodeon and Nick Jr.? Did we almost lose you to an adjacent-​but-​not-​quite-​kidlit career?

EL: Ha! Actually, I was always interested in children’s entertainment—around high school, I dreamed of working at Pixar, and that interest led me to Nickelodeon. And in my art history major, I wrote my thesis about Little Golden Book illustration. So I was always trying to find the kid-​angle while I was in college. I think it left some of my professors kind of confused.

RVC: Since I run into all kinds of art-​loving students at Ringling College, I also try to introduce a kid-​angle to their efforts, regardless of their major. Why not, right?

Let’s circle back to the presentation I mentioned in the bio that earned you the exceedingly rare OPB Muppets shout-​out. One of the things I took away from that Orlando SCBWI talk is your sincere love for and appreciation of nonfiction picture books. What do you like so much about this sometimes-​underappreciated type of book?

EL: First of all, thanks for your kind words about my presentation—it can be nerve-​wracking up there! It’s interesting that my love of picture book nonfiction struck you, because I don’t usually think of myself as a nonfiction editor (I’d say about 80% of my list is fiction). What I DO love is nonfiction that is creative, fun, and/​or unusual—in its subject, its writing style, its angle into the story, etc. Nonfiction that “reads like fiction.” I’m very selective with it. So you can be sure that if you see a nonfiction book I edited, it’s not just because I liked the topic—it’s because I found the approach particularly interesting or engaging.

RVC: Speaking of engaging, one of the nonfiction examples you used in Orlando was Skulls! by Blair Thornburgh (illustrated by Scott Campbell). For those who missed your talk, would you sum up a few of the reasons that you pounced—editorially speaking—on that book submission?

EL: #1, it made me LAUGH. OUT. LOUD. But it’s also extremely smart.

#2, I’d never seen anything like it before. It is completely fact-​based and scientifically accurate; it’s also totally wacky, and not remotely dry. It’s kind of un-​categorizable, actually.

#3, on reading Blair’s text, I could instantaneously picture what I wanted the book to look like (thank goodness Scott agreed and said yes!) The two of them knocked it out of the park!

RVC: A few of my creative writing students are interested in a career like yours. Let’s give it to them straight. What’s your day-​to-​day work like as an editor?

EL: I answer emails and go to meetings all day long, then go home to read and edit! (But some of those emails are really cool—like approaching an illustrator I love, or sending someone an offer. And some of those meetings are really fun—like digging into a sketch dummy with an art director, or presenting my books to get our in-​house teams excited about an upcoming list.)

RVC: Writing those “I love you and your work!” emails can indeed by fun. But what’s the most difficult aspect of your work?

EL: Time management is a big one. I strongly dislike negotiating contract terms (though it needs to be done!) and evaluating submissions is actually really tough. I get so very many of them, and it’s never fun to send a rejection. It’s extra-​hard when I fully see the merit in something and I really like it, but I just don’t have the space on my list, or I’m not 100% head-​over-​heels for it—only 99%.

RVC: Time and time again, I hear writers who lament how they wish they could do their own illustrations, like Jillian Tamaki or Sarah Williamson do. Make a case for the power of two creatives—the author + the illustrator—versus the all-​in-​one author/​illustrator.

EL: Even some of the most talented and successful author-​illustrators sometimes like to mix it up! I’ve seen an illustrator who writes her own stories fall in love with someone else’s text (like Jillian, who illustrated Julie Fogliano’s My Best Friend), and I’ve seen author-​illustrators write a story that they think would be best served by an artist with a different point of view (like Tomie dePaola, who wrote In a Small Kingdom, which was illustrated by Doug Salati).

Illustrating or writing vs. illustrating and writing can be totally different creative processes, stretching and refreshing your brain. Having a separate illustrator can take your story in wonderful, exciting directions that you couldn’t even imagine when you wrote it. And sometimes, particularly if you don’t have an art background and haven’t spent a lot of time developing your artistic craft, not illustrating your own book is simply the best decision for making the best book possible.

RVC: What are your feelings on illustration notes from writers?

EL: I don’t mind them when they’re critical to explaining a certain part of the story that the text doesn’t describe; or (and use this one selectively!) if you have a brilliant idea for what a certain page might show, and you phrase it as a *light suggestion.* Before sending a manuscript to an illustrator, I will delete pretty much any art notes that don’t fall into these categories.

Once an illustrator takes on a text, remember that it is now 50% their book.

RVC: How long does it take an editor to get situated when they change houses? And how soon is too soon to send them work?

EL: When I moved to Abrams, I’d say I felt situated about six months in, and I’ve been growing more comfortable ever since. I think I’ll feel truly at home once I’ve experienced one full round from acquisition to publication—my first full list of books comes out in Spring 2020, I can’t wait! And I’ve been receiving submissions here (from agents) since…two weeks before I started at Abrams?!

So, fire away!

RVC: Last question for this part of the interview. What’s the biggest story in kidlit that no one’s talking about enough?

EL: Did you see how Jeanette Winter’s beautiful picture book about Greta Thunberg, Our House Is on Fire, went from initial conversation with her editor to published book in two months?? That is a feat surpassed only by Greta herself sailing across the ocean to speak at the U.N.!

RVC: Greta is pretty amazing, and that amazingness is a great segue into the always-​amazing conclusion of every OPB interview. 

Cue the theme music. Open the velvet curtain. Turn on the spotlights. It’s time for … THE LIGHTNING ROUND! Zappy Qs and Zippy As, please. ARE YOU READY?

EL: Ready!

RVC: Most unexpected thing on your music playlist?

EL: Not sure if this is unexpected, but there sure is a lot of Hamilton on there…

RVC: “If I didn’t have a career involving books, I’d instead be _________”

EL: I’ll go with my childhood dream job: an elementary school art teacher!

RVC: Three picture book characters you’d love to have over for a dinner party?

EL: Frances the badger, of course; and let’s add in Lilly (and her Purple Plastic Purse) and Olivia. Dinner wouldn’t be boring, that’s for sure!

RVC: What’s your editorial superpower?

EL: I think I’m pretty good at finding the right illustrator to pair with a text! Also I have very colorful pens.

RVC: Best non-​Abrams picture book you’ve read in 2019?

EL: Two came immediately to mind: I absolutely loved The Important Thing About Margaret Wise Brown and Small in the City.

RVC: In five words or less, how do you measure success?

EL: Do it for the kids.

RVC: Thanks a bunch, Emma. It was indeed a pleasure getting to know you and your work a bit better!

EL: Thanks for having me, Ryan!

Editor Interview: Karen Nagel (Aladdin Books/​Simon & Schuster)

Meet Karen Nagel, Executive Editor at Aladdin Books/​Simon & Schuster. Prior to joining their team in 2011, she was a Senior Editor at Blue Apple Books (2008–2011) and Senior Editor at HarperCollins (2005–2008). But that’s the sort of bio stuff you hear about when you’re in a job interview, right? At OPB, we do more. We go deeper. We come at things from a different angle.

With that in mind, let’s uncover the REAL 411 about Karen via Six Awesome Karen Facts:

  1. Has had the same best friends since age 7.
  2. Did follow spots for an off-​off-​off Broadway production of Sam Shepard’s ‘Tooth of Crime.’
  3. Bicycled through Europe at 16 with American Youth Hostel.
  4. Has no appendix or tonsils.
  5. Loves laughing.
  6. Enjoys yoga.

And for those who DO yearn for traditional bios, let’s share that too.

Karen Nagel has had the great good fortune of a career in children’s book publishing. From #1 New York Times, USA Today, and Publishers Weekly bestselling books to Coretta Scott King and Society of Illustrator award winners, she has worked with many of industry’s most noteworthy authors and artists.

Today she is the Executive Editor at Simon & Schuster’s Aladdin Books, where she not only has continued to work on bestselling books, but perhaps more significantly has conceived and created new formats for emerging–and reluctant–young readers, planting the seeds for a lifelong love of books. A graduate of New York University, she’s a true believer in the transformative and transcendent power of the arts, the ocean, friendship, family, peace, and love.”

BOOM! Now that we’ve laid the groundwork here for a beautiful, well-​informed relationship, let’s plunge into the interview.

Here we go!

Aladdin Books website: http://simonandschusterpublishing.com/aladdin/

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/karen-nagel-7a5aa115/


See the source imageRVC: Let’s start with a question I’ve never asked an editor before. In 2017, you acquired world rights for Fox & Friends co-​host Ainsley Earhardt’s debut picture book, Take Heart, My Child: A Mother’s Dream. How are things different when working with a celebrity author?

KN: It might be easier for a celebrity author to promote and sell books as they have, for the most part, a built-​in audience and platform. But celebrity or not, it’s the personal connection I want to establish from the get-​go and the relationship we develop along the book-​creating process that is most important and impactful to me and to the story itself. The notable personalities I have the pleasure of working with have been terrific, as I think we at Aladdin do a wonderful job of reflecting what’s in their heart(s).

See the source imageRVC: What about the other celebrity book you’ve recently acquired, Parker Looks Up: An Extraordinary Moment, written by four-​year-​old Parker Curry and her mother, Jessica ?

KN: This has been a dream come true for Jessica and Parker, and to capture their experience on that historical and unforgettable day, has been a labor of love on our part.

I sure wouldn’t want to disappoint a four-​year-​old, would you?

RVC: Great point! In a Forbes.com article about Parker Looks Up, you said, “Does anyone ever know the moment that will forever change their lives?” Got a moment like that in your own life you’d like to share? Maybe the one that sent you down the path of kidlit publishing?

KN: Books from my aunt: Charlotte’s Web; Hello, Mrs. Piggle-​Wiggle; The Little Prince.

RVC: What’s the best non-​traditional training you’ve had that helped prepare you for your career as an editor?

KN: Summer sleep-​away camp. I’m not kidding.

RVC: Makes sense to me (I learned all too much at sleep-​away camps!). Now some might not know this, but you’re an author, too. How did your own book, Two Crazy Pigs, come about?

KN: My older son came home from camp (see, it’s camp again) one day, singing a silly made-​up song: We are two crazy pigs…and I was inspired! What would happen on a farm with two out-​of-​control piggys?

RVC: Do you have a sequel or another book in the works?

KN: I have a TCP sequel, and am just looking for the time to finish it…

RVC: I totally understand that–so many projects, so little time. Now let’s tackle a writer-​pleasing question. What’s “out” in the world of picture books? What’s yesterday’s news? What’s the equivalent of parachute pants, which we all love via the nostalgia sheen of memory, but we honestly don’t need to see again in real-​life anytime soon?

KN: Everything is cyclical, to my mind. And it seems short-​sighted to me to pigeonhole an idea as yesterday’s news…

RVC: Fair enough. One a scale of 1 to 11,000, how important is it that an aspiring author have a platform and/​or a viable, robust marketing plan?

See the source imageKN: These days, 9,000. But then there’s the Scottish Grandma reading The Wonky Donkey, and I doubt she was officially part of any type of platform or robust marketing plan.

RVC: If I could give you a bullhorn powerful enough to reach the ears of every single picture book author on the planet, but it only had enough juice to work for one sentence, what’s the one thing you’d tell them all?

KN: Revise, revise, revise, and remember to listen to and then speak from your real heart.

RVC: Without further ado, hubbub, or hullabaloo, it’s time for … THE SPEED ROUND! Shockingly fast Qs followed by lickety-​split As. Ready?

KN: Ready!

RVC: HERE WE GO! Game of Thrones—great TV series or the greatest TV series? 

KN: Great TV series.

RVC: Which cryptid would make the coolest pet—Sasquatch, Loch Ness Monster, or Chupacabra?

KN: Sasquatch.

RVC: “If I were still in book editing but NOT in the world of kidlit, I’d be editing ________.”

See the source imageKN: Biographies of musicians.

RVC: Favorite non-​Aladdin picture book from 2018?

KN: All Are Welcome by Alexandra Penfold and Suzanne Kaufman.

RVC: What Aladdin picture books coming out later this year are you most excited about?

See the source imageKN: Superbuns! By Diane Kredensor. The Presidents: Portraits of History by Leah Tinari. Parker Looks Up by Parker Curry and Jessica Curry.  Amy Wu and the Perfect Bao by Kat Zhang.

RVC: What’s the three-​item checklist for your dream picture book manuscript?

KN: Well-​written; funny; out-of-the-box.

RVC: Thanks a bunch, Karen. It’s been a pleasure helping the Only Picture Book family get to know you better. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Editor Interview: Charlie Ilgunas (Little Bee Books)

This month’s Industry Insider interview is with Charlie Ilgunas, Associate Editor at Little Bee Books. Once I saw how his Twitter bio claimed that despite what Pottermore tells him, his Patronus is a capybara, I knew we’d get along famously—my unofficial Patronus is a penguin, after all!

C’mon. Everyone knows that the capybara is just a furry, flipperless penguin.

Since we’ll hit on a lot of bio-​type stuff below, let’s just jump right into the Qs and As, okay? Onward!

Twitter: https://twitter.com/chillgunas
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/cilgunas/
Little Bee Books Website: https://littlebeebooks.com/


RVC: Instead of beginning with the typical “how did you get started?” questions, let’s go a different route. You’re been with Little Bee Books for almost five years now. In all that time, what have you come to realize distinguishes a Little Bee picture book from those that other publishers produce?

CI: I think I would define our books as sophisticated but accessible. We acquire a lot of books that revolve around little-​known stories or people, that happen around big events or movements, or discussing topics that don’t get discussed enough in picture books and middle grade. We’re also proud to work with GLAAD on titles that we hope will increase LGBTQ visibility in younger readers and accelerate inclusivity and acceptance.

RVC: What are a few of your titles that you think made big strides in that direction?

See the source imageCI: Prince & Knight has made the biggest impact so far; the reception to that one over the past year been fantastic! And its companion title, Maiden & Princess, just came out in April. This month we have two more coming out, Except When They Don’t, a book about gender stereotypes, and Our Rainbow, a board book about the colors of the pride flag.

RVC: Let’s talk about the process of getting great manuscripts into the hands of the decision makers. Early career writers ask me this all the time—what’s the difference between editor titles (assistant, associate, etc.)? Is one a better submission target for first-​time-​at-​book-​length picture book authors?

CI: It can mean different things at different houses. At large houses, since their lists are bigger, the roles can be a bit more rigid. Editorial assistants assist the director/​publisher with their work and any admin, research, and submission help, whereas assistant editors are there to help a particular editor on the team and are getting more hands-​on experience in the editorial process—and this is usually the time that they start getting a few of their own acquisitions. Associate editor is the next step up and are essentially junior editors that are forming their own list.

At Little Bee, however, we’re quite a small publisher, so roles are more fluid! When I was an editorial assistant, about 7 months in I took something to acquisitions and signed my first title. And when I became assistant editor, I was essentially acquiring and building my own list. So there is a lot of creative freedom and involvement in the editorial process allowed for assistants here, which I really appreciated.

As for targeting submissions, I wouldn’t say that any one is a better target for debut authors. Newer editors might have less preconceived notions about a text and don’t have as much in the back of their mind to compare it to other projects they’ve worked on or the publisher’s list, but even so, that still gets brought up in acquisitions by other members of the team who do have that experience!

RVC: After earning your BA in English Lit from Washington University in St. Louis, you got a Graduate Certificate in Publishing at the Denver Publishing Institute at the University of Denver. What was that certificate program like? How did it prepare you for being a kidlit editor?

CI: The certificate program was a great experience. It really appealed to me because it was solely focused on books, and the ones at Columbia and NYU have half their curriculum devoted to magazines/​digital media, which I wasn’t interested in. It prepared me in that it exposed me to a lot of aspects and functions involved in the process of getting a book from acquisitions to publication that I hadn’t thought of or was aware of at the time. And it also connected me with a lot of other people who were passionate about publishing and helped me prepare for getting my first job!

RVC: How did you find yourself in the kidlit publishing side versus, say, handling textbooks, literary fiction, or potboilers?

CI: It’s kind of funny–I remember that a big chunk of the group at Denver loved the kidlit presentation (from Greenwillow Books) and seemed determined to get into kid’s books. At the time, I was actually leaning more toward adult fiction or nonfiction. But as time passed and I was trying to get my foot in the door anywhere, I ended up getting an internship at Bloomsbury in their children’s department that completely changed my perspective. Now, I can’t imagine doing anything else!

RVC: What finally sold you on kidlit?

CI: I think what clicked when I started working there is that I just reconnected with what made me fall in love with books as a child. The sweeping illustrations and zany or heart-​melting stories of picture books, the feeling of anticipation with a great adventure, the desire to get spooked with a creepy middle grade. I think in a lot of ways, adult books (and some YA, to an extent), can be locked into tropes and conventions of whatever genre it is, but with picture books and middle grade, I feel that their worlds and characters are so open and that they can go anywhere in the next turn of the page.

RVC: Three of my own students have recently decided that being a book editor might be for them. What path do you recommend they take after they finish their BFA in the creative writing program I run at Ringling College of Art and Design?

CI: Internships are really the best way to get into the business, since you’ll build experience, a pool of references, and may even by hired by the company you intern with. I was lucky because the internship I did with Bloomsbury was both paid and open-​ended, meaning I could work there until I found an editorial assistant job.

Another thing I’ll say is that you shouldn’t be picky about what you apply to. As I said, I was really focused toward adult books, but I started applying to everything, even managing editorial jobs. And that’s actually how I got the Bloomsbury job—I interviewed for a managing editorial internship and didn’t get it (because I had absolutely no managing ed experience!), but I got along so will with the managing editor that she sent me an e‑mail when there was an editorial internship opening and recommended me to the hiring editors.

See the source imageRVC: You recently acquired Albert D.J. Cashier and Two Grooms on a Cake in a two-​book deal with Rob Sanders, a friend of OPB. (In fact, his was the first interview we ever did.) What drew you to those manuscripts? (I confess I feel a real stake in this since I knew these manuscripts well before you ever saw them—Rob talked about them during his frequent classroom visits at Ringling College.) 

CI: So, we were first presented with two manuscripts, Albert D.J. Cashier and one we didn’t end up acquiring. I really liked Albert because it was a really interesting story that I hadn’t heard anything about before. And I was so impressed with Rob’s research. His backmatter is very extensive, and in the editing process, it was fascinating to comb through a 192-​page pension file to see all the back and forth about Albert’s case.

Two Grooms on a Cake actually came at the last minute; we were about to settle the contract for Albert when the agent sent it over, and I couldn’t have been happier reading through it. It was such a great perspective to tell the story of America’s first gay wedding from, and since we already had Albert slated for 2020, Two Grooms would come out in 2021, the 50th anniversary of Jack and Michael’s wedding. It was too perfect!

RVC: I hear a lot from picture book authors who can’t seem to break through. What’s the most common thing that ends up being the deal breaker for an otherwise-​pretty-​solid manuscript?

CI: I read a lot of picture books that have very solid, even fantastic ideas, but just peter out at the end and don’t have a satisfying arc. Having a great idea is important, but the author still needs to find somewhere to take it and a way to make it a full story—one that will keep a distracted kid interested at story times or when learning to read for themselves, one they will want to read again and again.

RVC: One last question before we reach the much-​ballyhooed, never-​equaled, always-​appreciated LIGHTNING ROUND! What kind of picture books do you think the marketplace is missing right now?

CI: I think what’s exciting is that there is such a diversity of stories being told today that there aren’t as many things clearly and perceptibly missing from the market. But one thing I can think of is that I wish that there was more room for unusual picture book formats—oversized, or unusually shaped, or the like. A lot of accounts are pretty quick to reject stuff like this since they have shelf requirements, but indies are pretty accommodating to these types of formats as long as they think it’s cool and see buyers for it!

RVC: Okay, it’s time. Lightning-​fast Qs and As please! Ready?

CI: Let’s do this!

RVC: Most underappreciated Harry Potter spell?

CI: Arania Exumai—it’s only in the movies, but I would use this all time against spiders!

RVC: Favorite burger joint in NYC?

CI: I don’t know if I’m qualified to say, since I was a vegetarian for 8 years until recently; I haven’t had too many yet! I like Shake Shack, and there’s a place near where I live called Burger Club that makes a great burger.

RVC: On a scale of 1 to 1,000, how excited would you be to get a picture book manuscript about (or by!) a capybara?

CI: I actually have one right now that includes a capybara! Not the main character, though, so not quite 1,000, but I was still so excited.

RVC: The #1 Little Bee picture book to watch for in 2020?

CI: Grandpa Grumps. I loved working on this book so so much; it will make you laugh and cry (and possibly hungry)!

RVC: Your favorite non-​Little Bee picture book of 2018?

See the source imageCI: I thought We Don’t Eat Our Classmates was hilarious. And Dreamers is utterly gorgeous.

RVC: Three words that describe your work (or goals or philosophy—whatever works best here) as an editor.

CI: Curiosity. Conscientiousness. Wonder.

RVC: Thanks so much, Charlie. Much appreciated!